Recordings of the last rehearsal of the CSO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Feedback on reference recording 3: La Valse (Codarts Symphony Orchestra)

 

 

 

 

 

My own feedback:

At the stage I almost felt like an actor:

– I had the feeling that my body language was really big or even over the top

– I felt that I tried to match my playing and that of the first violins with the conductor’s intentions most of the time, but I also felt that I wanted to have more contact with the conductor

– I think my way of leading helped the first violin section at certain spots

– I felt that my face showed the expression of the music

– I sometimes made eye contact with the other string principles (maybe not enough, I used my ears more than that I used my eyes)

– I was turning to the audience a little (the conductor and I spoke about this – since he thought there was no particular need to turn towards the audience at a certain phrase, I kept this a little small)

When judging the videos, I think that:

– my body language is very clear, but sometimes it could be more open

– I’m trying to match my playing and that of the first violins with the intentions of the conductor, but I should do this with the whole orchestra

– watching the conductor seems okay

– the contact with the first violin section is good

– it’s difficult to see my face, I’m curious about my facial expressions

– just listening to the other orchestra members isn’t enough: I need to make eye contact more often

– I want to make more contact with the audience – maybe turning more clearly towards the hall, despite the conductor’s opinion….??

– many things wich felt over the top during the concert are okay or even a little small: is there a need to act even MORE over the top?

 

Feedback from the audience and first violins:

Very positive actually! šŸ™‚

“Well done”, “congratulations”, “I really liked your leading, great”, “it was nice to work with you”, “thank you”, “I just followed your bow and shiftings in the concerto for English horn because it’s always good to follow the concertmaster”.

 

Feedback from experts:

Hans Leenders:

positief :
-goed gespeeld
-veel goede tips voor de groep
-mooie solo
verbeterpunten:
-meer rust uitstralen, meer open houding die natuurlijk gezag uitstraalt. Is mij nog te gesloten.
– meer initiatief durven te nemen in de timing. Soms speelt de strijkerssektie een fractie traag. Het is de taak van de CM om hierin het initiatief te nemen en het ook fysiek aan te geven. Mag duidelijker.

-verbaal nog meer durven de ruimte te nemen

Over het geheel genomen een grote vooruitgang t.o.v. van de vorige keer met Dvorak cello concert.

 

Gijs Kramers:

Ziet er heel goed uit vind ik. Je bent er zeer goed bij en uiterst betrouwbaar. Je lichaamstaal is in principe duidelijk, 3 (kleine) dingen:
-zorg dat alles wat je doet organisch is, ook het klaarzetten van je viool. Als cm zit er zit een groep achter je die niet nadenkt en je gewoon klakkeloos volgt
-laat het begin van afstreken net een klein beetje meer zien in het algemeen
-je volgt heel goed, maar ik vind dat je iets meer initiatief kan nemen. Jij bent ook een leider, misschien niet zo belangrijk als de dirigent, maar wel bijna.
Benzion Shamir:
Het ziet er goed uit, je had misschien soms iets meer streek kunnen gebruiken, verder heb ik geen commentaar want het ziet er goed uit.
Joris van Rijn:
Ā Je volgt fantastisch en bent ook goed te volgen wat betreft timing, interpretatie van de slag van de dirigent , stokindeling etc. Zo te zien kun je het ook goed spelen (ook het solootje). Makkelijk is het niet echt, weet ik!
Wat je nog meer zou kunnen doen is het aangeven van (vooral zachte) dynamiek. Vaak is bijvoorbeeld de terugweg van een hairpin (< >) een ondergeschoven kindje. Het helpen vormgeven van het stuk, voor zover je geen dirigent bent
Verder kan je horizon qua aanvoeren nog wat verder liggen zodat meer contact met blazers/ slagwerk.Ā  Je kunt ook aan de strijkers laten zien dat bijv. de hobo een belangrijk moment heeft en ze dwingen te luisteren (zonder te overdrijven natuurlijk: meer als onderdeel van het dynamische plaatje)
Over sommige aspecten kan ik aan de hand van dit filmpje natuurlijk minder zeggen (Repetities, opmerkingen, sociale interactie etc)Goed bezig!

Nadia Wijzenbeek:
Igor Gruppman:
You looked good in the videos. You could be even more active in your body language.
Timing was good. Upbeats could be more reflective of the character of music.
You can be better connected to other strong Principals and to your section.
You read conductor well.
Arne Visser:
1) goede lichaamstaal, je staat boven de materie en leidt de groep / het orkest op overtuigende wijze.
2) de inzetten en de muziek geef je goed aan, je straalt zelfvertrouwen en rust uit, speelt met overwicht de partij en leidt de groep.
3) je hebt het concertmeester-ambacht nu goed in de vingers, ik denk dat je klaar bent voor de volgende stap: naast de muziek aangeven (vooral bij de 1e violen) ook het hele orkest inspireren en motiveren. Concreet gesproken betekent dat dus: net zoals de dirigent in het filmpje doet, de espressivo-, explosieve en zwier- maar ook intieme momenten met je lichaam aangeven (met bovenlichaam en gezicht).
Goed bezig.
Johan Rooze (over de MatthƤus Passion bij het Dudok Koor en Orkest):
Heel goed gedaan, je speelt heel open en communicatief en dat heb je nodig bij een aanvoerder.

Preparation for visiting rehearsals: four questions for the concertmaster

Artistic Research bijwonen repetities vragen of interview concertmeester

Preparation for visiting rehearsals: where to pay attention to

Artistic Research voorbereiding bijwonen repetities

Feedback of the experts

Below you can find the feedback (in Dutch) I received from the experts on the second reference recording (the rehearsal of Valerius, 13 October 2015). “…” is a literal quote from written feedback; without the “…” I made a transcription of spoken comments.

Cecile Huijnen, concertmaster of Het Gelders Orkest:

“Filmpje ziet er goed uit. Lijkt me allemaal heel duidelijk.”

 

Benzion Shamir, violin teacher:

Het orkest klinkt vreselijk, maar wat jij doet, ziet er goed uit, je lichaamstaal is duidelijk.

 

Gijs Kramers, viola teacher/player:

Het is heel duidelijk, Ā je hebt een natuurlijke lichaamstaal die je goed inzet.

 

Arne Visser, conductor of Valerius:

“Je bent afgelopen maanden steeds beter gaan aanvoeren. Je leunt iets meer naar achteren, en geeft met je hoofd inzetten en belangrijke noten goed aan, en zoekt hiermee goed contact met de hoge en lage strijkers. Ook reageer je steeds meer op onregelmatigheden in de 1e vioolgroep maar ook in andere orkestgroepen. De energie die je uitstraalt is volgens mij hetzelfde gebleven: niet te dominant maar wel pittig genoeg.”

Intervention cycle and progress (reference recording 2)

Intervention cycle: where am I at the moment?

During my last intervention cycle a few things kept coming back:

Ā Use my body language in a more active way, for example by turning towards the group.

– Ā Be more present or take the lead, so find a way between being friendly and being authoritative.

– Be more selfsecured.

I used these things as a guideline in my actual intervention cycle. At the bottom of this page you’ll find a YouTube video in which I try to show how I’m dealing with these things now. As you can see, I made a written description as well.

The recording was made at the 13th of October 2015 during a rehearsal of Valerius.

 

Description and video

Beginning: as you can see, I’m present: I’m speaking to the group.

0:26h I’m turning a little and I’m conducting, to speed up the rest of the group (body language/being present)

0:34h I’m giving every note (body language/being present)

0:41h I’m bending, to show dynamics (body language/being present)

0:48h I’m straightening my back to show a crescendo (body language/being present)

0:56h I’m ā€œconductingā€ a little bit (body language/being present)

1:06h (CRAP!)

1:10h I’m giving an entranceĀ (body language/being present)

1:22h I’m trying to prevent us from speeding upĀ (body language/being present)

1:28h I’m having eye contact with the conductor

1:30h I’m turning to the group because of a tempo change: this helps us to be together (turning/body language/being present)

1:48h I’m giving a nod at a “center/meeting point”Ā (body language/being present)

1:55h I’m showing a ritenutoĀ (body language/being present)

2:00h We’re playing a broad melody: I’m playing with full bow and am looking around to warn people: please use your bow the same way as I’m doing!Ā (body language/being present)

2:23h I make a mistake and I apologise (friendly way of leading)

2:38h I’m giving instructions: use as much bow as you’ve got, and skip the old bowings (being present)

3:10h I’m answering the girl next to me

3:18h I’m using my body language to tell the orchestra members to create a broad soundĀ (body language/being present)

3:22h I’m checking whether everybody has understood the right bowings and the amount of bow that is requested (being present)

3:38h I’m showing: make noise, fffff!!!Ā (body language/being present)

3:41h I’m conducting the last noteĀ (body language/being present)

3:46h I’m giving a forteĀ entranceĀ (body language/being present)

3:52h I’m conducting and bending a littleĀ (body language/being present)

3:58h I keep playing whether the group is right or not, so that they can follow me (the horn is behind, so there might be confusion) (being present)

4:01h I’m marking the harmonic changesĀ (body language/being present)

4:09h idem

4:13h idem

4:21h I’m smiling to tell the conductor that I heard his remark

4:30h I’m joking with the girl next to me (this could be a friendly way of leading)

Feedback AR3

Marijke Schaap_AR3_feedback

Feedback AR3

In the link above you’ll find the feedback of my AR3-exam.

The most important things that came out:

– Show clear intervention cycles, clarify ideas. Intervention cycle means:Ā Recording -> feedback -> data collection -> intervention -> recording

– Build network

– Make sure to solve technical problems before the exam (use USB)

 

End of this intervention cycle

To finish this intervention cycle (which actually wasn’t finished yet during the exam), I need to take the following steps.

1) Put a short recording on the blog and explain what can be seen (this was meant to take place during the exam, but since I made a mistake with YouTube I couldn’t show the video). DONE

2) Put the feedback of the experts on my blog (conductors, concertmasters, teachers). DONE

3) Visit rehearsals of professional orchestras! Contact orchestras DONE, make a list with questions/things to pay attention to DONEĀ and make sure to record parts of the rehearsal (ask permission to do this).

4)Ā (Partly) read my book about concertmasters.

5) Make a new recording at the CSO or the Dudok Ensemble to put the information into practise.

 

 

Joseph Silverstein

http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/obituaries/2015/11/24/joseph-silverstein-renowned-violinist-and-bso-concertmaster-for-years-dies/akvXsKrere1lokotflC1GL/story.html

“House rules” of a concertmaster

Here is a checklist with things a concertmaster needs to take care of.

– He is the leader of the first violin section.

– He is the leader of the orchestra.

– He is the first solo violinist and has to perform all concertmaster soli. Sometimes he’ll perform as a soloist.

– He is the intermediary/contact between the orchestra and the conductor.

– He has to lead group or string rehearsals.

– He is responsible for the bowings while keeping the desired articulation in mind, or he needs to translate the desired articulation into the right bowings.

– He has to lead in a physical way and has to be able to show his intentions with movements and body language.

– In case someone doesn’t perform well, he needs to speak with this person in order to get him back on track.

– He has to create social cohesion if necessary.

– In amateur orchestras: he has to help others to play well.

– Maybe only in amateur orchestras: he has to support the players mentally.

 

Several leadership styles could be used in order to achieve these things.

Confidence and being present: examples

One of the things that came out of the first questionnaire filled in by orchestra members, was my apparent lack of self confidence and my behaviour (which was being judged as “too friendly”). Here are a few examples of what I did after I read these outcomes.

– A string player didn’t have the time or energy to practise at home. During some rehearsals I helped him: I gave him bowings and fingerings and we practised his solo together. I did this a few times. Result: he forgot all the fingerings I gave him and he was sightreading his solo every rehearsal.

When, after too many rehearsals, he still didn’t practise the solo at home, I told him to correct this before the next rehearsal and that I expected it to be ready, whether he’d got time/energy left or not. Result: the next rehearsal he played the entire solo correctly, for the first time.

– I spoke with a string principal, who generally kept loosing himself in the music or in the air, and who wasn’t paying attention to ensemble playing anymore because of this. I told him to make sure to keep eye contact, so that bowings and articulation would be the same. I explained he still would be on time when he followed my bow instead of the baton (usually he was showing too much initiative and he was entering too early), which he didn’t believe. So we did an experiment, in which I showed him what I meant: I started playing random sixteenth notes with accellerandi and ritardandi; he had to follow, and after a minute we switched roles. Fast result: we were playing perfectly together. Long term result: he still has got the tendency to be too much on his own, but he is definitely paying more attention to the first violins.

– A while ago I had to lead a string rehearsal. All string sections played well, but unfortunately the first violins got lost all the time because I was conducting instead of playing, and it was clear they didn’t prepare themselves enough on beforehand. After a while I told them to go and find a different room, so that they could do a sectional rehearsal. Result: I could do a good rehearsal on details with the rest of the string orchestra, instead of having to pay attention to the wrong notes at my left hand…

These are a few examples of my way of leading now: I’m literally taking the lead and I’m direct to people who didn’t prepare enough. This is a difference: before the last intervention cycle I felt a little “embarassed” toĀ approach individuals who kept the group from moving forward (both during and outside rehearsals), and therefore I tried not to do so – or to do it in a way that was so friendly that maybe they didn’t realise I wanted them to change something. Now I’m quite direct in making my intensions clear.